Well I wasn't suggesting that 😀
That computational photography aspect (including capacity for better AF, and leading EVF) is perhaps one of the hardest things to develop - requiring generational renewal of the sensor, processing power and 'computer' architecture to suit, along the lines of Moore's Law. Olympus was fairly laggardly with that even prior to the takeover. In fact I recall reading somewhere that the smartphone type photosite cell grouping was not on their radar, which is a bit of a worry. (mind you - it's not a high priority for the other format manufacturers either - just the smartphone monster consuming them all from the toes up !)
You really have to announce that as a company direction, then strive for it and deliver.
It will be difficult strategically as they just don't have the volumes, revenue, or profitability, to be able to keep up with the leaders of the pack. And that is where they must compete, even if via a different format.
Look at Nikon even - they announced leading, drawback free EVF'S as a cornerstone of their Mirrorless push, and then promptly just proceeded to play in the middle of the field.
It is interesting that the only product Olympus have limited the bird recognition AF to is the EM1X - the most un-MFT-like of MFT's because of its APS-C/FF size and weight ! I hope that changes, and they introduce that, and even more precise eye AF across the prosumer & 'pro' ranges.
My biggest concern is that they can't keep up the hardware and software development pace, and end up in a slow fade to mediocrity and oblivion.
So while there is that druther, there is plenty of opportunity as I mentioned.
Loooooong long term, I think the MFT format size would make a very nice curved sensor and system alliance launching pad .....
Chosun 🙅