As I see the problem, it (or whatever competitors evolve) will become impossible to dismiss even if we wanted to. As long as it is something Big Tech can use to harvest our data were going to be stuck with it. It will soon be what "Google it" is now.Dismiss gpt at your peril.
ah, you too dream of unicorns.I call for the start of the Butlerian Jihad right now before it is too late.
?... I'm sure I'm capable of seeing unicorns, there just seem to be none.it’s just I’m not capable of seeing neutral color hue
Perhaps the unicorns are there but are simply not neutral..............?... I'm sure I'm capable of seeing unicorns, there just seem to be none.
Lol. You’re not looking hard enough. They like to hide in high grass, use higher magnification.?... I'm sure I'm capable of seeing unicorns, there just seem to be none.
Same here, I love the Swarovski sharpness and to me truer color, but the Leica and Nikons are so much easier on my eyes over longer observing sessions. My eyes are not as fatigued at the end of the day.about a couple years ago I ordered a Uvid hd + 8x32 and compared it with my Nikon MHG 8x30 and Swaro CL 8x30 (original). The CL looked to have accurate or neutral (no bias) colors compared to the Leica which had a touch of yellow. The Nikon showed stronger more obvious yellow compared to the Leica.
The Nikon and Leica have rich colors but different tones to them. I preferred the Uvid colors the most. I liked the CL more natural presentation second. I do like the colors in the MHG although I find it a little too warm (yellow) in general. However, its warm type of view is very easy on the eyes during prolonged viewing.
Interesting!I love the Swarovski sharpness and to me truer color, but the Leica and Nikons are so much easier on my eyes over longervobserving sessions.
That's obviously not a unicorn, just an ordinary horse with random stuff photoshopped onto its head. (Narwhal presumably, and Pamela Anderson's hair?)You’re not looking hard enough. They like to hide in high grass, use higher magnification.
Oh so you’re saying I was tricked by some local farmer that had horse stables. I’ll get back into the field this weekend once I get back from my yeti searching trip 😆. And I don’t mean the travel mugs from Walmart.That's obviously not a unicorn, just an ordinary horse with random stuff photoshopped onto its head. (Narwhal presumably, and Pamela Anderson's hair?)
Look at medieval tapestries. Unicorns are smaller and more delicate, with rather different features. The problem must just be a lack of patience to lure one anymore.
Clearly the problem is you can’t tell whether it’s a horse or a unicorn because you’re using the wrong binocular.Oh so you’re saying I was tricked by some local farmer that had horse stables. I’ll get back into the field this weekend once I get back from my yeti searching trip 😆. And I don’t mean the travel mugs from Walmart.
I don't know.... Doesn't Zeiss make lenses for spectacles too ? Maybe even for implants. Maybe they even coat these things... but I thought that my lens implants might lend a bit more objectivity, compared to eyes with OEM lenses. (which discolor as we age) ....