Even at the zenith, with a 46 inch scope or binocular it will be empty magnification at 6,000x.
Getting a 46 inch aperture binocular well aligned at 6,000x must only work momentarily, as tube flexing will quickly alter the incredibly fine adjustments needed.
I would think that at 6,000x a binocular merged image was not achieved, and only one side was used.
Sure, it is easy enough to get a 6,000x magnification.
Small binoculars are made up to 100x and 80mm up to about 160x, advertised as the most powerful in the world.
They are not.
And the top magnification is just empty magnification, which reduces what can be seen, not increases what can be seen.
As to extremes, Horace Dall employed a focal length of 900 metres, i.e. 900,000mm for his Mercury photos.
Also with the atmospheric dispersion corrector, which he invented.
The image almost filled a 35mm film frame, and the 900m focal length was not empty magnification.
I have used 1100x on Jupiter's moons with a fine 12.5 inch custom Dall Kirkham, but above 700x was empty magnification.
I think that Pic du Midi in France probably has or had the best seeing, and 2,000x would work there with the 1 metre scope.
NASA used this and I think a 1.5metre scope for high resolution Moon and Mars photos.
Getting back to the topic of a 10x36 binocular, I used a 12x45 Russian binocular, best of six, for 10 years as my main binocular. It is ideal in light pollution and clearly outresolves the Nikon EII 10x35 hand held. The balance of the old design 12x45 is for me perfect.
Both the Nikon EII 10x35 and 8x30 are too short and stubby for best hand holding results.
B.
P.S.
It might be possible to align the two 46 inch telescopes at 6,000x when they are both pointing straight up.
I wouldn't like to try aligning them.
But still 6,000x would be empty magnification.
Incredible resolution of star discs is being achieved by having several 1 metre scopes separated by maybe hundreds of metres in an array. The accuracy needed is phenomenal.
The resolution is about ten times better than previously achieved.
P.P.S.
Liquid mirror telescopes pointing at the zenith were first postulated by Newton, but stable spinning speeds couldn't be achieved.
He realised the surface is a paraboloid.
The first working one was in 1872.
Canada made a 6.5 metre one and is working on an 8 metre version in a better location.
A multi mirror version is planned giving an equivalent of a 70 metre aperture telescope.
The reflective material is usually mercury, but I don't know how safety is assured.