• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

New OM-1 (1 Viewer)

Only just got my OM1 and don't know what I'm doing yet, but, yes, used that; nice to christen it with a local Night Heron. Canons & Sony put aside for the moment....
Have your third part batteries come yet? The only ones that I have been able to find take ages to come. I have got one spare but would prefer the security of more on a trip where electricity is not always totally reliable.
 
Have your third part batteries come yet? The only ones that I have been able to find take ages to come. I have got one spare but would prefer the security of more on a trip where electricity is not always totally reliable.
No, I thought it was coming Amazon Prime next day delivery, but when my order had gone through they said August sometime. I've now got an Olympus battery that's been dispatched by T4 Cameras and should arrive on Monday.
 
Have your third part batteries come yet? The only ones that I have been able to find take ages to come. I have got one spare but would prefer the security of more on a trip where electricity is not always totally reliable.
Had the same worries before we went to Costa Rica recently. As it turned out apart from a couple of nights staying "off grid" it wasn't an issue anyway but we took a couple of decent power banks as back up just in case. Also I was happy with battery life: on a big hummer day I had 20% left after 2k+ shots. On another with lots of IBIS & EVF usage had 30% left after 900 shots (which was the worst case in 3 weeks: only changed to 2nd battery once on trip & that was only as a precaution). The only thing I will do is invest in an external charger as I'm not keen on the in-body charging. Just waiting for more feedback on 3rd party chargers given the extortionate price of the official charger!
 
The cheap JJC charger is fine, if a bit slow. It takes 4 hours plus to charge the battery from well down. It shows how the charge is progessing and it's supposed to cut off when fully charged to prevent over-charging.
 
Just got my cheap third party battery (off Amazon) even though they said (after I'd ordered it) that it wouldn't arrive for another month. It seems absolutely fine, except that I now notice it's 2000mAh whereas the Olympus one in 2280mAh, so it'll presumably only last 88% as long for each charge. Correspondingly, it should be quicker to charge though :)
 
Steve

I have just got an OM1 after Pxing my complete canon system and am looking for a 3rd party battery. You said you had just got one from Amazon. Which one was it please there seem to be several.
 
Steve

I have just got an OM1 after Pxing my complete canon system and am looking for a 3rd party battery. You said you had just got one from Amazon. Which one was it please there seem to be several.
The one I got is advertised as 2000 mAh. I didn't notice it at the time, but this is slightly less capacity than the OM one. It works fine, but I wouldn't necessarily recommend it for that reason.

 
Steve

I have just got an OM1 after Pxing my complete canon system and am looking for a 3rd party battery. You said you had just got one from Amazon. Which one was it please there seem to be several.
I've been using my OM-1 pretty intensively and thus far have yet to use my spare battery - I've never really found any 3rd party battery to be totally satisfactory with any of my previous Olympus (or Canon) cameras.
I go for the cheaper option now and carry round a small anker powerbank in my pocket so I can recharge the camera/phone/any electronic device during the course of the day, and cover all bases by doing so.

James
 
Thanks Pauhana, interesting info, seems the metabones adapter doesn´t fit without modification.

/Anders
 
I am extremely glad I got this camera, with the 100 - 400 lens before I went to Uganda. Having had no chance to practise, I didn't have much of a clue but still pretty happy with the results. I'd certainly recommend this combination; I just need to learn how to use it properly now.
 
Last edited:
Joined the OM-1 club today as new camera along with oly 100-400 Arrived today. After renting this combo I knew I was moving on from Canon. next up is to add 12-200, and probably a fast prime or two. 300 f4 down the road
 
Hi all. I've read this thread with interest. I'm not photography expert and so don't understand much of the technical content.
At present I use a Canon EOS 7D mkii with f2.8 300 prime lens and 2x converter. Very happy with quality of the photos in all conditions, taking the 2x converter off when the light isn't so great. However very very heavy of course carrying on a blackrapid strap and with my back problems (annual epidurals) I'm not sure this is a longterm solution.
I met briefly a guy in Finland who sweared by this camera. How would the picture quality compare if I switched to on of these with say a 100-400 and a 2x converter ?
Is light an issue in dense vegetation given presumably smaller narrowed lens ?
Does it have the equivalent of an IS stabilising system ?

From data on the web it looks like weight would be 1719g vs my current 3745g.......

Thanks
Tony
 
Last edited:
The 100 - 400mm is already equivalent to 200 - 800m in 35mm terms, so I wouldn't rush to put a 2x convertor on it. I believe the IBIS is 7 stops. It doesn't work in synch with the IS in the 100 - 400mm lens but I believe that still helps a bit. I have read that the combination is 7.5 stops. Noise is less than the 7D mark ii. I would never go back to a 7D which I used with the 100 - 400 for some time. This is vast improvement and a lot lighter.
 
The 100 - 400mm is already equivalent to 200 - 800m in 35mm terms, so I wouldn't rush to put a 2x convertor on it. I believe the IBIS is 7 stops. It doesn't work in synch with the IS in the 100 - 400mm lens but I believe that still helps a bit. I have read that the combination is 7.5 stops. Noise is less than the 7D mark ii. I would never go back to a 7D which I used with the 100 - 400 for some time. This is vast improvement and a lot lighter.
Thanks Steve.

I recall you had moved from the Canon D7mkii to the Sony bridge camera. Do you find this a real step up from that camera ?
Does the IBIS being "7 stops" mean that the IBIS allows you to shoot pictures that are as sharp as shots taken without IBIS with 7 stops less light ?
Would take a while to get used to the different Olympus settings for bird photos. Presume there is a spot focus option for birds in a bush in addition to the birds in flight setting !

Thanks
Tony
 
Yes it is. The Sony is great for its size, but not great at high ISO. I was starting to feel a bit frustrating with its limitations but knew I wasn't going to go back to lugging a SLR around. The OM system was tempting me anyway but the OM-1 sjust proved too much to resist. I still use it when I'm primarily birding but the OM-1 is just in a different league.

I am really still getting used to it. yes there is spot focus but generally use bird or animal detection modes. Which usually work well.
 
Tony, FWIW, I moved from Canon 7D2 albeit with just 400mm f5.6 (& sometimes 1.4 TC) to Olympus nearly 3 years ago & once I got familiar with the EM-1.2 which I originally bought wouldn't think I'd ever go back (getting used to mirrorless after DSLR was biggest difficulty & took some time to get used to).

I started out with the 300mm and the 1.4 TC just because I found them at an almost unbelievably good price for sale with the EM-1 from someone who couldn't get on with mirrorless! I've since got the OM-1 (April this year) and in-between also the 100-400 zoom & the 2x TC.

In practice I almost exclusively use the 300mm, with the 1.4 TC more or less permanently attached. The 300mm and OM-1 give you full sync-IS which I think is somewhere around 7 stops whereas there is no sync-IS using the 100-400 zoom so nominally around 5 stops based on IBIS. In practice I've found that IS with both lenses with and without TC's to be exceptional although I rarely use a TC with the zoom as it does slow down autofocus and anyway light in the UK doesn't often encourage it! Personally I think the 2x TC is pushing it in most cases for the zoom though on the 300 it is excellent and I readily use it.

I've found the OM-1 to be a huge step forward for birding - both static and even more so for BIF's. The bird detect option works well & I have it set on for most birding situations, the exception being where the target is partially obscured and I need to try to get a single point on the target to try and ensure focus is on the bird (there have been occasions where the auto focus is thrown by the vegetation if I use the C2 options below):
C1 - for difficult focussing situations, ie. target partially obscured = S-AF, single point focus, bird detect OFF
C2 - most other non-flying targets = C-AF, small block focus points, bird detect ON
C3 - BIF's = C-AF, all focus points, bird detect ON

If you're interested in seeing some results I've just loaded some from our visit to Costa Rica this spring onto flickr - that includes quite a lots of BIF's and also plenty of forest-dwellers where light was minimal (at worst, down to 1/6th hand held at 840mm effective length for Scaled Antpitta). Not sure how they'll hold up against your own photos from CR as I have no claims to be any more than a birder taking some record shots!

 
I think the f4 300mm is the better lens if you are concentrating on birds. Although it is twice the price. For me, as a general naturalist, who spends quite a bit of time photographing large mammals, the 100 - 400 is a a much better choice. I have C1 similar to CB Allen's C1, C2 similar to C3 and C3 with animal detect for mammal photography.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top