Trinovid 10x32 vs other Trinovids (1 Viewer)

[JelmerP]

Hi all,

I am quite sure I want to buy a Leica Trinovid but am a bit unsure about the model.
I would prefer a 10x magnification, as I've previously been annoyed now and then by just too little magnification of my current 8x bins when looking at small passerines high up in high trees (especially in north america and the tropics).

I have seen a 10x32 BN for a decent price, so am thinking strongly of purchasing this one.
The only thing I am little bit uncomfortable with is the high magnification for such a small bin, 10x would seem more suitable for a size 42 (In terms of shakiness and light).

So is there anyone who can comment on the performance of the 10x32 (BA or BN) in this respect?

Thanks a lot,

Jelmer Poelstra
The Netherlands

 

[JelmerP]

Anyone?

 

[KorHaan]

Welcome to Birdforum, Jelmer.

I had a 10x32 BN about ten years ago, an excellent pair of binoculars IMO.
They are quicker than 10x42's to get on small birds, and considerably more comfy to wear especially in the tropics. I believe they are 660 grams and are seemingly indestructable. The FOV is excellent and the image is bright enough for birding in woodland. Foolishly enough I sold them, because I believed I wanted 7x bins.
10x is definitely better for birding especially in such a small package.

That said, I've finally discovered the advantages of Image Stabilized bins by Canon.
You might want to try the 10x42 L IS's from Canon. A whole lot bigger and heavier than the small 10x32 Leica's, but unless you've got very steady hands they'll show more detail than the Leica's, and they are the only Canons that are waterproof.

Nevertheless the Leica 10x32 BN is an excellent choice, but remember to try them first before you decide to buy them, to see if you like them.

Best regards and good luck,

Ronald Sinoo

 

[jimtrader11]

Hi Jelmer,

I have the Trinovid 10x32 and like it a lot. Its compact, gives a very sharp image and has such close focus that I can almost see my shoes. Focus knob is very smooth and for me not to fast or too slow. Earlier, I also tried the 10x42 against the 8x32 and decided the 10x42 while it gave a great view, was just too heavy. I bought the 8x32 then when I saw a good deal on 10x32 closeouts,for $995, I also picked one of them up and am quite happy with it. (Yes, I'm a binocuholic).

I suggest you try 10x32 vs 10x42 before you decide, since preference varies a lot between people.

That said, right now my favorites are a Nikon SE 10x42 (not waterproof, slow precise focus and larger than the Trinovid 10x32). Soon though I will likely take out the Trinovid 10x32, to enjoy its versatility and quality again.

Jim

 

[JelmerP]

Many thanks for your replies, Ronald & Jim.

I'll have another look at both of them but at least this is reassuring with respect to the 10x.

Jelmer

 

[thisdudeisgood]

trinovid 10x32BN

Hi

I own the 10x32BN purchased from new for £699 and find the image outstanding.

I find 10x gives the detail I need for finer details. Dont worry about brightness. These are very bright, as bright as you like and brighter than many 8x32 bins ive looked through.

I cannot find any fault with the image at all, the sharpness and brightness and colour is truly amazing. A feast for the eyes.

I dont ever see me changing these as they have it all as far as i can see (pardon the pun!)

The quality of workmanship in these makes them a joy to own.

I purchased the black rubber swarovski objective covers for my 10x32BN's and they fit perfectly as if they were designed for the leica. these are highly recommended and cheap!

The lense coatings on mine are blue as they were one of the very last ones made.

One gripe I do have is that the eye lenses mark up very easily and are hard to get looking clean! I would say the lense coatings are pretty delicate compared to other binoculars I own.

It is strange that leica did not supply objective lense covers as standard. However the rain guard covers are superb.

And the neck strap is not for everyone although I like it. It is of a very high quality with leather connectors etc! It is not neoprene but has a rubber neck pad with small rubber anti slip dots on the inside and the leica logo. If you carry your bins over your shoulder this is a boon as it does not slip off! If im wearing a t shirt the rubber can pull at the skin but if your neck is covered ( as it is most of the time living in Scotland! ) there is no difference.

They are small in the hand and reassuringly heavy ( well if you think 600 odd grams is heavy! you must be a woman ha ha!).

For observing birds and nature look no further, you will be very very happy with these.

Im pretty fussy about my gear but I would recommend these to anyone 100%

 

[Kevin Purcell]

Except perhaps eyeglass wearers?

They have a rather short ER. Unfortunately that seems to be a compact Leica trait.

 

[thisdudeisgood]

ok fair enough, appologies. i dont wear specs so i cant comment. perhaps these are less practically good for spec wearers.

however if your a spec wearer and can 'learn' how to use these then your in for a treat.

i will say though that i have never held a better made binocular. these ooze quality.

 

[sammyboy]

I agree with thisdude, the ER isn't a problem for me, it's more problems with blackouts - I'll have to learn how to place the oculars to my eyes in a certain way probably to avoid them. It's a shame the eyecups haven't got a halfway setting, but these are such good quality I'll find a way to get round this!

 

[LHB1]

Jelmer,
I have both the Leica 10x32 and 10x42 Trinovid BA binocs. If my notes are correct:
a. 10x32 = 13mm ER, 357 ft FOV, 23 oz.
b. 10x42 = 14mm ER, 331 ft FOV, 31 oz.

When sitting in one place for viewing I prefer the 42 binocs but when walking, the 32's are almost always chosen. I can't tell any practical difference in brightness except very late in evening, at dusk. Hope this helps.

LB