I simply have to return to this one …
kuhli
● as in (for example) White-browed Hawk
Leucopternis kuhli BONAPARTE 1850 (
here) as "
Leucopternis Kuhli". Without dedication, however the commemoration itself is not questioned at all.
In today´s
HBW Alive Key explained as: Reading the recent Paper
The bird collection of the Muséum national d‘Histoire naturelle, Paris, France: the first years (1793-1825), 2015,
here, (by "our" Birdforum member Justin Jansen! :t
it is written, for the year 1823 (p.101
"
… amongst them birds collected by Heinrich Kuhl (1797-1821) …"
In my MS I (also, still) have him as "the fairly unknown German ornithologist and traveller Dr. Heinrich Kuhl (179
7–1821)".
Wasn´t he born 17 September 1797 in the City of Hanau, Germany" (as stated in Posts; 2, 8, 9 and 16) ...
?
Which is correct? And which is not?
---