Zen Ray bino's
Hi, Steve-
Thanks for the advice/comments. You were pretty much right on!
I received the Zen Ray's this week, day before yesterday- and am pretty happy with them. I have spent some time during the daytime comparing them with my Swift 804 HR-5's and Celestron Regal 8x42 LX's.
As you stated, the objective covers are lacking- I've had one fall off already... a shame, since they fit the objectives/body nicely. They're simply made too lightly. The loops would make good rubber bands. The case will probably have to be replaced, too- as while nice for the bino's, the case would be a little crowded when you attach a strap.
Which brings me to the biggest disappointment/forehead slap of all- the neckstrap! What WERE they thinking?????? I find it somewhat uncomfortable to have binoculars- when hanging from the strap- to bang against my knees! O.K., I'm exaggerationg to make a point- they hang at upper thigh!
Now I could simply shorten the strap ends- were it not for those horribly cheesy disconnects that are attached right about where you might want to have the bino's connected. So the strap also has to go. Which means most of what comes with the bino needs to go. A shame, when it's the easy stuff to fix/make right!
Now it would be easy to replace accessories, as I frequently do- but neckstraps usually are nicely embossed with the makers name... so it'd really be lousy to have, say- a pair of Zen Ray binoculars hanging off of a Vortex neckstrap!! That's not going to happen!
Of course, the bino's perform as advertised, and the wider fov is its most outstanding feature. Wider than either the Swift's or the Regal's. I do, however- notice a lack of "3-dimensionality" when comparing either of the roof's with the porro's... I guess this must be a characteristic of the porro's. The roof's views seem flatter when simultaneously viewing objects that are at different distances. That is a characteristic of the Swift's I really like. Now to get them out at night and see how the night sky looks in that wider FOV!
Wes