KenM
Well-known member
Shot several days ago, essentially concolourously pale upperparts, whitish unders, creamy yellow toes with a ''seemingly'' longish bill?
Comments welcome
Comments welcome
Is this the bird at Leyton, if so, it looked a lot more pallid in life?
Doesn't look short-primaried or pointy-faced enough for a Blyth's Reed, are you thinking Marsh?
Ken, are you sure the last image is of the same bird as the first 3?
More Images of Stuart Fisher's, Leyton, London, adult Reed Warbler with worn plumage.
The first two images were taken on Saturday 22nd November, an overcast day with intermittent showers (Image no.2. showing the emargination on p3 in alignment with end of tertials), an A.scirpaceous requisite.
IMO the lighting was more neutral, and gave a more accurate interpretation of the bird's paleness, the other images were taken under brighter conditions, giving the uppers an ''A.palustris'' look, with strikingly white underparts.
Cheers
I doubt this is a Marsh, it just does not look/feel like one to me.
However, and despite the relatively long PP and P3 emargination seemingly situated quite high on the feather edge , some of the photos in the last batch do give a Blyth's impression, at least to my eyes.
But I guess such a showy bird at such a late date for the UK has been quite extensively scrutinized and Blyth's conclusively ruled out? Or?
I doubt this is a Marsh, it just does not look/feel like one to me.
However, and despite the relatively long PP and P3 emargination seemingly situated quite high on the feather edge , some of the photos in the last batch do give a Blyth's impression, at least to my eyes.
But I guess such a showy bird at such a late date for the UK has been quite extensively scrutinized and Blyth's conclusively ruled out? Or?
My problem is that it has been anything but showy:C