• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Search results

  1. njlarsen

    Turdidae

    Maybe better to state that it is beyond my level of expertise. Niels
  2. njlarsen

    Turdidae

    The below snip is from a 2007 paper by Voelker et al. according to which it could be done. Whether their statements are correct is beyond me. Niels
  3. njlarsen

    Turdidae

    Interesting that the recommendation is "no" because of lack of published data Niels
  4. njlarsen

    Turdidae

    I am not sure I follow you here. How would reverting to an older type species be upsetting as long as both are members of the genus as currently defined? It would become upsetting at the moment that a split moved the two apart but not before. Niels
  5. njlarsen

    Turdidae

    If you take the above maps and only show December, both forms are seen in CR during that month. Whether those determinations are correctly identified observations is unknown to me. Niels
  6. njlarsen

    Turdidae

    I believe I have a couple of photos which eventually needs to be looked at in more detail ... Niels
  7. njlarsen

    Turdidae

    Both forms are defined as ebird groups. Here are the maps: https://ebird.org/map/swathr1?neg=true&env.minX=&env.minY=&env.maxX=&env.maxY=&zh=false&gp=false&ev=Z&mr=1-12&bmo=1&emo=12&yr=all&byr=1900&eyr=2019...
  8. njlarsen

    Turdidae

    I probably would have gone with Pan-Tepui instead of the single word version (Pantepui). I realize that sounds weird coming from someone Danish; we are known for combining words! Niels
  9. njlarsen

    Turdidae

    But the remarks state that they went with Pantepui over Tepui as common name ... Niels
  10. njlarsen

    Turdidae

    I have especially looked at discussions for the Americas. Where 10 years ago you might get away with using only mitochondrial DNA as indicator of species status, currently you will have to include nuclear areas before the evidence will be taken seriously. Niels
  11. njlarsen

    Turdidae

    So too strong conclusions from a relatively weak dataset? You would never get a species split based on only mitochondrial DNA, so why should you get lumping from only that? Niels
Back
Top