-
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Search results
-
X-T3 for bird photography
That's superb. Can you post the link to this article?- katastrofa
- Post #29
- Forum: Fuji
-
X-T3 for bird photography
It depends whether you're comparing IQ / equipment weight, IQ / dollar value or something else.- katastrofa
- Post #19
- Forum: Fuji
-
X-T3 for bird photography
True, but X-T3 compensates for that partially by increasing the pixel count (Oly E-M1 II: 20 MP. X-T3: 26 MP).- katastrofa
- Post #17
- Forum: Fuji
-
X-T3 for bird photography
Result for Olympus E-M1 II: EM1 II noise: [15.81686416 11.71363376 19.2771104 0. ] Which confirms that my results are not pure nonsense.- katastrofa
- Post #12
- Forum: Fuji
-
X-T3 for bird photography
I even made a numerical (though not scientific) test: I took PNG snapshots of the area you selected as photographed by X-T2 and by X-T3. Loaded them into Python and calculated the standard deviations of each channel (R,G,B,alpha): import imageio import numpy as np x_t2 =...- katastrofa
- Post #11
- Forum: Fuji
-
X-T3 for bird photography
You have a point that X-T3 > Oly (I never said it wasn't), but X-T3 and X-T2 are IMHO approximately the same.- katastrofa
- Post #10
- Forum: Fuji
-
X-T3 for bird photography
I see the difference on a uniform black background. I rarely take photos of those ;-)- katastrofa
- Post #5
- Forum: Fuji
-
X-T3 for bird photography
Studio comparison shots: https://www.dpreview.com/articles/2055051743/fujifilm-x-t3-added-to-studio-test-scene-comparison I'm not terribly impressed by the high ISO performance of X-T3. The advantage over X-T2 seems marginal, and only a bit better than marginal over Olympus E-M1 II.- katastrofa
- Post #2
- Forum: Fuji